Monday, April 12, 2010

Materials List/Timeline/Proposal

List of Materials:
3 slide projectors
Slides
Foam for "canvases"
Mesh/screen
Wooden dowels
White foam core board
Tape (?)

Timeline:
This Week
Gather materials
Finalize layout of the space and slide content

Next Week
Construct space

Following Week
Finish construction details
Adjust according to critique received

Paragraph Explanation:
For our final project, we would like to explore the situational space of the gallery. There are a number of behaviours that visitors to galleries know to assume once they enter the gallery space - relative silence, a certain distance from the canvas or work of art, awareness of the other visitors, etc. - but these behaviours are more implicit guidelines than actual rules. We are interested in streamlining and standardizing these behaviours so that they become mechanized amongst the visitors to our gallery space, and in turn become the art itself. Participants will be given specific instructions about how to act within the gallery space once they have entered it, and, hopefully, a provocative sculpture/performance will result.

Saturday, April 3, 2010

Projection

I really enjoyed working on this project. The quick pace meant it was relatively low-stress, and a little more playful, if less refined in its final formulation, than the body assignment. Overall, though, I was pleased with the outcome and the collaborative process. I do think the view of the project from the exterior was quite beautiful - definitely evocative of a blizzard - and was interesting in that class members became performers, participants in the piece. However, a number of aspects of the project could have been improved with some more time.

The project was not particularly successful in communicating our initial idea (courtesy of Sara) of exploring meditation and breathing through light. In order to better assert this aspect of the piece (which is still present in the subtext of the piece as is) we might have (as noted in class) chosen a different soundtrack. I was the member of the group that selected and "mixed" the sound for the piece, and my original desire was to find a calm wooshing wind sound that could easily be associated with breath, but I was unable to find the exact noise I was looking for. I settled for a more violent gust of wind, which is probably the source of the blizzard associations made by the majority of the class (along with the white colour of the fabric and the light projected upon the piece). Other possibilities for sound that could be used instead of the sound chosen, and that might produce a more meditative mood, include rolling waves, a more appropriate wind sound, or actual breathing (although my personal opinion is that actual breathing might be to obvious and make the piece seem like a space designed for yoga exercise rather than a piece of art [this statement would probably prompt a great deal of debate in our class, but for now, I'll leave it as is]). The problem with choosing different sound would then be that the blizzard associations might disappear, making the view from the outside less interesting. Anyways, the sound is certainly something to think about and an aspect of the final product that I would probably be tweak were we to do the project over again.

Another portion of the piece that I think all of us would probably liked to have altered is the distance between the walls of white fabric. We wanted the walkways to get bigger and bigger as one moves towards the back of the piece in order to mimic the expansion of lungs, the process of enlightenment, etc. The walkways did work in this way, but had we had more time, space, etc., we probably would have made this gradual expansion a little more obvious.

The final major aspect of the work that requires improvement (although there are many more small changes that could be made, such as using fabric chosen by us specifically for the piece, rather than found, approximately appropriate fabric) is the space at the end. This is a point that was mentioned during critique and that troubled us during construction. The space lacks resolution (though we attempted to add this, first by placing a chair in the final compartment - which came off as extraneous - and then by projecting light through the back wall). What should one do when one reaches the end? What is the significance of the final space? Does the light represent death? Enlightenment? Should it be there at all? Would pillows on the floor be more effective, encouraging participants to recline, relax, and meditate? Meditate about what? Their own breath and subsequently their bodies, their mortality? These are just some of many questions that could be explored in greater depth if work on the piece were to continue.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Collaboration with Zach

So, I suppose it is time to post about the assignment we so recently completed (on Monday, March 15th, to be exact). For this project, we were asked to collaborate on a piece of art that would have some sort of interesting relationship to the body. I think that both my collaboration with Zach and our piece turned out very well.

We started by simply coming to each other with our individual ideas. Playing with the fabric didn't bring on any major epiphanies for me, but when I saw the black flower that Lizzie had constructed whilst experimenting in class, an image immediately popped into my head of a sarcophagus-type structure fashioned out of wood to mimic the human form (although more angular and less curvy than a traditional sarcophagus). The inside was covered with flowers made out of black fabric, creating an interesting texture, and a light bulb was inserted through the top (just above the head of the person who would theoretically be standing inside). A number of things about this mental picture interested me. I liked the idea of constricting the human form, rather than accommodating it, and I thought that the associations with death that the structure would probably conjure up would add layers to this concept of corporeal constriction. Aesthetically, I also found it strong in that the form contained multiple layers of contrast. The boxiness of the structure opposed the flowing nature of the lines discernible within the flowers. The darkness of the flowers contrasted with the stark brightness of the light bulb. The allusions that the "sarcophagus" shape and the unpolished wood exterior might make to archaeological digs (culture) stood in distinction to the flowers (nature), whose overabundance might indicate an organic overgrowth (a natural reclamation of cultural space).

Zach had some different ideas - although they turned out to be quite compatible with my own. He was interested in creating a more sprawling space using repetitive forms evocative of ribs, the spine, etc. We were, however, both intrigued by opposition - Zach wanted to make a curvy structure using linear forms (i.e. post and lintel architraves of varying heights covered in fabric to create a a curvilinear exterior) - and, if my memory serves me correctly, he wanted his space, like the one I had in mind, to be dark. Finally, Zach was similarly attracted to the idea of playing with light and dark. The variations in height of his modular forms would accommodate varying amounts of light, and he talked about starting with small shapes that would gradually become larger, so that the light that entered the space would mirror the trajectory of light entering a camera, or exiting a projector.

We both appreciated each other's ideas, and our project grew from our initial instinct to combine them - insert the "sarcophagus" into the hollow within the "ribs"; we basically just edited and progressed from that starting point, exploring shared themes of the intersection between life and death, the interplay between light and shadow, etc. And we definitely helped each other along the way. Zach took over the responsibility of putting the basic structure of the room together, and I jumped into making roses, which I knew would take a long time. But whenever Zach needed help (e.g. stretching fabric across the ceiling and stapling it on one side while he stapled it along the other) or advice, I would provide it, and vice versa.

I would say that the second part of the collaboration (i.e. after the first part - the concept) truly began on the Sunday before the project was due, when Zach had finished creating the "coffin". We carefully began piecing the interior together and feeding off of each other's energies. To give one good example of this productive back-and-forth dynamic, after seeing the "coffin" shape covered in the same black fabric as the interior of the space (a frustratingly difficult task which Zach had taken upon himself to complete), I was dissatisfied. There were a number of pockets and bubbles that were not aesthetically pleasing, and, having been less than thrilled with the appearance of my previous project (the furniture assignment), I was not exactly willing to settle. I started covering the interior of the "sarcophagus" with strip after strip of black electrical tape in order to give the planes of the interior the flatness we had been attempting to achieve. Unfortunately, however, we ran out of electrical tape before the inside was finished. Zach then came up with the idea of meticulously cutting strips of fabric, which would mimic strips of electrical tape, to cover the interior instead. We were constantly coming up with solutions to problems the other person was having with the project, or simply coming up with interesting ideas. There is much more I could say, but this post is becoming quite lengthy, so I think I will stop for now. But anyways, we failed in certain respects, and succeeded in others. On to the next project!

Monday, March 1, 2010

Furniture

For this project, I decided to make a wall partition, or a wall divider - whatever you want to call it. I watch a lot of television (I'm a cinema studies, MCM concentrator... it's a good excuse), and during the day the sunlight makes it difficult to watch the screen. Building a wall partition that would be able to block enough sunlight to improve the picture of the television seemed like a good solution to this problem. I also have a fair amount of clutter in the living room in my apartment, and I wanted to make something that would to hide the suitcases, boxes, etc. that are shoved against the wall next to my TV. These objects, however, do not reach as high as the television, and placing the partition directly in front of them would significantly reduce the amount of sunlight that is able to enter the room - something that is not desirable when I am not watching TV. So, the idea that the partition should have moving parts that would make its height alterable was introduced into my thought process.

I ended up constructing a freestanding rectangular wooden frame out of the split two by fours in to which I slid a series of shapes that were meant to approximate wood grain. These shapes were chosen in an attempt to make the OSB more attractive and more easily identifiable as wood.

Ultimately, however, I feel that the project was an aesthetic failure. Or, perhaps not a complete aesthetic failure. There are definitely some interesting and salvageable ideas in the piece that could be made visually appealing, but they require some refinement. If I were to re-do the project, there are a number of things that might be done to improve the appearance of the wall divider.

1) I could paint the OSB (and possibly the wood frame as well) various colours. If I were to do this, however, I would probably choose to cut the OSB into different shapes, since the wood grain shapes would become irrelevant (the wood that they refer to would no longer be exposed).

2) I could use different, more attractive wood for the central panel.

3) I could cut the OSB into geometric shapes such as rectangles. Such shapes, which might be removed and rearranged without much difficulty, would make it easier to play with the texture and "transparency" of the screen, making it less clunky-looking.

All in all, however, I enjoyed working with the wood (especially being able to use the power tools), hearing feedback from my peers (they had lots of good ideas), and seeing all of the other furniture. I'm looking forward to the "human form" assignment, and hope my collaboration with Zach turns out a little better than the wall partition I built by myself!

Friday, February 19, 2010

Tin Foil Assignment

I had a very different experience working with tin foil than the other students in the class. Due to my absence because of my (amazing) visit to the Winter Olympics, I was unable to collaborate with other students in the class. Consequently, I worked on the assignment on my own, and it is still a work in progress. There are a lot of things I find compelling about tin foil as a material: its lustrousness, its fragility, its malleability, its surprising strength. I chose to explore all of these properties in the project I am working on, in which I am wrapping thin strips of tinfoil around each other to create a large cylindrical/conical shape. The result, I hope, will display the tinfoil's malleability and lustrousness (the edge of the tinfoil as it is wrapped around itself bends in different directions, creating a multi-faceted surface that reflects light in an interesting manner), as well as its fragility and strength (the thin, delicate-looking edge of the tinfoil will be exploited to create a thick three-dimensional structure that should be able to withstand an unexpected amount of pressure), very well.

On a related note, I was able to see the other students' pieces in class on Wednesday and was incredibly impressed at the diverse ways in which my peers handled the tinfoil in order to produce beautiful works of art.

Faculty Club Lunch

Oops. I haven't posted in a while! But I'm going to catch up today. The lunch we all shared at the Faculty Club was great. Not only was the food delicious, but the conversation was also stimulating. I sincerely enjoyed being taken through the Bilt website by Alex, Pete, and Miles, and getting a firsthand explanation of the furniture they have built together. I additionally enjoyed seeing Richard's work, although I do wish he would have finished the slideshow - I always find the different processes and approaches that disparate artists take with respect to their work to be fascinating. Finally, I just wanted to briefly reiterate some of the thoughts I had about our conversation about the class. I agree with some of the opinions expressed that working on a large-scale, open-ended collaborative project too soon would probably turn out to be a negative, rather than positive and inspiring, experience. I think it would be best for all of us to get a feel for the materials we enjoy working with most, and also to learn more about each other before we embark on such an ambitious project. Additionally, materials that I would like to explore further within the context of the class include video, sound, and FABRIC, as well as any exceptionally bizarre materials suggested by other students.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Class 2

I had a much better experience working with the dough yesterday than I did last class; looking at how the pieces I made on Monday turned out helped me to focus my efforts immediately. I had made a dough ball in which I stuck little pieces of blue glass, and then stretched a thin layer of dough over it. When baked, the dough ball looked like a blueberry muffin top. And although these results weren't particularly impressive, seeing the piece made me realize that I was interested in exploring the translucency of stretched-out dough a little more. I was much happier with the knives that I made in class on Wednesday than with anything I made on Monday, even though I couldn't bake them. I also enjoyed getting to know my peers a little more.